Court Nixes Class Settlement Approval for Lack of Representatives’ Standing to Seek Key Injunctive Relief
Posted on Apr 28, 2023 in Class Actions | Comments Off on Court Nixes Class Settlement Approval for Lack of Representatives’ Standing to Seek Key Injunctive Relief
The Eleventh Circuit recently vacated approval of a class settlement which included, as an integral part, injunctive relief that no class representative had Article III standing to seek. Williams v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC, 2023 WL 2906311 (11th Cir. Apr. 12, 2023), was brought on behalf of a class of individuals who purchased “brain performance supplements” under the brand name Neuriva....
Full Court to Rehear Uninjured Class Member TCPA Standing Case
Posted on Mar 16, 2023 in Class Actions | Comments Off on Full Court to Rehear Uninjured Class Member TCPA Standing Case
The en banc Eleventh Circuit announced on March 13 that it would rehear Drazen v. Pinto and vacated the panel opinion. As discussed in our post on the panel decision, the case addresses whether class members who lack Article III standing with respect to the claims asserted by the class are nonetheless permitted to receive benefits from a class settlement. The case also features a...
Sharing Information with Trusted Vendors Does Not Confer Article III Standing for FDCPA Claim
Posted on Sep 17, 2022 in Jurisdiction | Comments Off on Sharing Information with Trusted Vendors Does Not Confer Article III Standing for FDCPA Claim
The en banc Eleventh Circuit has issued its third and presumably final opinion in the tortured history of Hunstein v. Preferred Collection & Management Services, Inc., 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 25233 (11th Cir. Sept. 8, 2022). The court held that the plaintiff failed to allege facts sufficient to establish Article III standing to assert a claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices...
Settlement Class Defined to Include Uninjured Members Cannot Be Approved
Posted on Aug 18, 2022 in Class Actions | Comments Off on Settlement Class Defined to Include Uninjured Members Cannot Be Approved
An appeal concerning the meaning of coupon settlements under the Class Action Fairness Act instead produced an important opinion, Drazen v. Pinto, 2022 LEXIS 20766 (11th Cir. July 27, 2022), addressing the certification of classes that are defined to include members who have not been injured. Some background may be helpful in understanding the ruling. In TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 141...
Receiver for Entity Involved in Fraud Lacked Standing to Bring Aiding and Abetting Claims against Bank
Posted on Aug 5, 2022 in Jurisdiction | Comments Off on Receiver for Entity Involved in Fraud Lacked Standing to Bring Aiding and Abetting Claims against Bank
A divided Eleventh Circuit panel held in Perlman v. PNC Bank, N.A., 38 F.4th 899 (11th Cir. June 27, 2022), that a court-appointed receiver lacked standing to bring claims against the bank which, he alleged, aided and abetted the fraudulent scheme committed by the companies for which he was appointed receiver. The receiver’s action was thus properly dismissed for lack of subject matter...