ACLU Gets Jurisdictional Discovery from Michael Jackson Because of Disputed Facts
Posted on Jun 29, 2017 in Civil Procedure, Jurisdiction | Comments Off on ACLU Gets Jurisdictional Discovery from Michael Jackson Because of Disputed Facts
When is a litigant entitled to jurisdictional discovery? The Eleventh Circuit addressed this issue in an opinion published June 20, 2017, ACLU of Florida, Inc. v. City of Sarasota, 2017 WL 2636542, holding that, when the jurisdictional facts are genuinely in dispute and a party does not unduly delay in seeking discovery, the court abuses its discretion if it completely denies...
Dual Citizenship Does Not Create CAFA Jurisdiction
Posted on Apr 3, 2017 in Civil Procedure, Jurisdiction | Comments Off on Dual Citizenship Does Not Create CAFA Jurisdiction
Two insurance class actions will remain in state court after the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Life of the South Insurance Co. v. Carzell, 2017 WL 1174083 (11th Cir. Mar. 29, 2017) (Marcus, J.). The court held that federal diversity jurisdiction does not exist under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) if all defendants and plaintiff class members are citizens of a single...
When Confirming Diversity of Citizenship, Trust—but Verify
Posted on Mar 22, 2017 in Civil Procedure | Comments Off on When Confirming Diversity of Citizenship, Trust—but Verify
In Purchasing Power, LLC v. Bluestem Brands, Inc., 2017 WL 1046103 (11th Cir. Mar. 20, 2017), the Eleventh Circuit reminded litigants and their counsel that it is critical to confirm the citizenship of all relevant corporate entities in determining the existence of diversity jurisdiction, but reversed the district judge’s order imposing “inherent power” sanctions on a party which had...
CAFA’s Local-Controversy Provision Can’t Trump Federal-Question Jurisdiction
Posted on Mar 7, 2017 in Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Jurisdiction | Comments Off on CAFA’s Local-Controversy Provision Can’t Trump Federal-Question Jurisdiction
The Eleventh Circuit reinstated a federal RICO case but approved the denial of a motion to remand it to state court under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) in Blevins v. Aksut, No. 16-11585, 2017 WL 782288 (11th Cir. Mar. 1, 2017). The court’s opinion confirms that CAFA’s local-controversy provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(4), does not strip federal courts of jurisdiction over...