Eversheds Sutherland 11th Circuit Business Blog
content top

Failure to Comply with Rule 9(b)’s Particularity Requirement Dooms Claims under the False Claims Act

Payments by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation to an employee responsible for referring HIV-positive patients to healthcare services offered by the Foundation fall within the employee exemption to the Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)(3)(B), according to the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Carrel v. AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Inc., 2018 WL 3734278 (11th Cir. Aug. 7, 2018). ...

Court Revives Suit Against Employer that Allegedly Denied Woman Promotion for Not Being Korean

The Eleventh Circuit recently gave new life to a plaintiff’s claims of employment discrimination in Jefferson v. Sewon America, Inc., 2018 WL 2449228 (11th Cir. June 1, 2018). Jerberee Jefferson, an African-American woman, filed suit against her former employer, Sewon America, Inc., for racial discrimination and retaliatory termination.  Although Jefferson began her career at Sewon...

En Banc Reminder: Even Self-Serving and Uncorroborated Affidavits Can Preclude Summary Judgment

On January 31, 2018, the full Eleventh Circuit held “that an affidavit which satisfies Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may create an issue of material fact and preclude summary judgment even if it is self-serving and uncorroborated.” United States v. Stein, 2018 WL 635960 (11th Cir. Jan 31, 2018) (en banc). The court treated the case as an opportunity to bring its tax...

Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Applied to Alien Tort Statute in Jurisdictional Dispute over Folk Singer’s Death

A popular Chilean folk singer named Víctor Jara was tortured and killed in the wake of the 1973 military coup that toppled Salvador Allende’s government and brought Augusto Pinochet to power. Nearly 40 years later, Jara’s family discovered that his suspected killer, a former Chilean military officer named Pedro Pablo Barrientos Núñez, had moved to Florida and become a U.S. citizen....

No Willful Violation of Fair Credit Reporting Act If Report Technically Accurate, Even If Misleading, Given Split on “Maximum Possible Accuracy”

In Pedro v. TransUnion LLC, 2017 WL 3623926 (11th Cir. Aug. 24, 2017), the Eleventh Circuit concluded that a consumer reporting agency did not adopt an “objectively unreasonable interpretation” of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) when it stated on a consumer’s credit report that she was an authorized user of her parents’ credit card account (which later went into default) and...

« Older Entries