Eversheds Sutherland 11th Circuit Business Blog
content top

COURT GRANTS EN BANC REHEARING IN BODY SHOPS’ INSURANCE ANTITRUST ACTION

The Eleventh Circuit voted to accept en banc rehearing in Quality Auto Painting Center of Roselle, Inc. v. State Farm Indemnity Co., 870 F.3d 1262 (11th Cir. 2017), a decision we covered here last September. The now-vacated panel decision, authored by Judge Wilson, had reversed the dismissal of antitrust and state-law claims asserted by auto-body-shop owners against a number of...

Court Limits Right to Cure Improper “Shotgun” Pleadings

The term “shotgun pleading” refers to a complaint that, for one reason or other, fails to give the defendants adequate notice of the claims against them. In the Eleventh Circuit, courts have identified roughly four categories of shotgun pleadings: (1) a pleading with multiple counts where each count adopts the allegations of all preceding counts; (2) a pleading that relies on...

Body Shops Can Proceed with Antitrust Claims Against Auto Insurers

A divided panel of the Eleventh Circuit has reversed the dismissal of antitrust and state law claims asserted by auto body shops against automobile insurers. Quality Auto Painting Ctr. of Roselle, Inc. v. State Farm Indem. Co., 2017 WL 3910750 (11th Cir. Sept. 7, 2017).  Senior Judge Lanier Anderson’s lengthy dissent and partial concurrence would have affirmed the dismissal of all of...

NO ERISA CLAIMS FOR MULTI-EMPLOYER PENSION FUND CONTRIBUTOR

Responding to a pension fund’s dire financial condition, its board passed an amendment requiring employers withdrawing from the fund to pay a portion of the fund’s deficiency. One contributing employer, WestRock, then sought a declaratory judgment that the amendment violated ERISA, arguing on appeal that it had a claim under 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(10) or 1451(a). Whether these provisions...

When Confirming Diversity of Citizenship, Trust—but Verify

In Purchasing Power, LLC v. Bluestem Brands, Inc., 2017 WL 1046103 (11th Cir. Mar. 20, 2017), the Eleventh Circuit reminded litigants and their counsel that it is critical to confirm the citizenship of all relevant corporate entities in determining the existence of diversity jurisdiction, but reversed the district judge’s order imposing “inherent power” sanctions on a party which had...

« Older Entries