In a case of first impression, the Eleventh Circuit held that when a claim sounds in fraud, based on the underlying allegations, it must comply with Federal Rule 9(b)’s particularity requirement. This requirement applies to claims asserting violations of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA). Because the plaintiff failed to plead his FDUTPA…
Author: Kamryn Alexander
Summary Judgment for Insurer Improper in Bad Faith Case Where Insurer Failed to Initiate Settlement Negotiations After Deadly Shooting
A reasonable jury could have found that a property insurer knew or should have known it was clearly liable to pay its insured the $50,000 policy limit in a case involving a bar fight gone wrong, culminating in a deadly shooting. Kinsale Insurance Company v. Pride of St. Lucie Lodge 1189, Inc., No. 22-12675, 2025…
Interpretation of Competing “Other Insurance” Clauses Turns on Policy Language, Not Broad Categories or Labels
In Gemini Insurance Co. v. Zurich American Insurance Co., No. 22-13495, __ F.4th__, 2024 WL 4553123, (Oct. 23, 2024), two insurance companies disputed what share of a $2 million settlement each was required to pay under Florida law. The answer turned on the interpretation and interaction of two “other insurance” clauses. Gemini and Zurich both…
Roth IRAs, Like Traditional IRAs, Are Excluded from a Georgia Debtor’s Bankruptcy Estate
In a case of first impression, the Eleventh Circuit held that Roth IRAs are excluded from Georgia debtors’ bankruptcy estates under the Bankruptcy Code and Georgia’s garnishment statute. In Hoffman v. Signature Bank of Georgia (In re Hoffman), 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 2119 (11th Cir. Jan. 24, 2022), the court reversed the district court’s affirmance…
No Direct Physical Loss or Damage, No Coverage: All-Risk Policy Does Not Cover Lost Profits Due to COVID-19 Government Restrictions
The Eleventh Circuit held that an insured’s policy did not cover the lost profits it suffered as a result of government restrictions implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic because the policy only covered “direct physical loss or damage.” Ascent Hospitality Management Co. v. Employers Insurance Co. of Wasau, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 1161 (11th…