Eversheds Sutherland 11th Circuit Business Blog
content top

ACLU Gets Jurisdictional Discovery from Michael Jackson Because of Disputed Facts

When is a litigant entitled to jurisdictional discovery? The Eleventh Circuit addressed this issue in an opinion published June 20, 2017, ACLU of Florida, Inc. v. City of Sarasota, 2017 WL 2636542, holding that, when the jurisdictional facts are genuinely in dispute and a party does not unduly delay in seeking discovery, the court abuses its discretion if it completely denies...

Improper Claim-Splitting Warrants Dismissal

In a case of first impression, the Eleventh Circuit has held that a plaintiff’s second case against a defendant, arising out of the same nucleus of operative facts, was properly dismissed as the product of improper claim-splitting. Vanover v. NCO Fin. Servs., Inc., 2017 WL 2129557 (11th Cir. May 17, 2017). In 2014, Karen Vanover sued NCO Financial Systems in federal court, claiming...

To Bar, or Not to Bar: That Is the Certified Question

How long after winning a judgment in the federal court can a Florida plaintiff conduct post-judgment collection efforts? That is the question at the heart of Salinas v. Ramsey, 2017 WL 1593469 (11th Cir. May 2, 2017). The issue has been decided differently in cases before the Florida District Courts of Appeal, and so Tuesday, the Eleventh Circuit certified a question to the Florida...

Asset Buyer Not Bound by Lanham Act Injunction Without Proof of Actual Notice

The buyer of most of the operating assets of a company subject to a Lanham Act injunction was held by the Eleventh Circuit not to be subject to the injunction, even though the seller’s CEO and owner became president and part-owner of the buyer as part of the sale. ADT LLC v. NorthStar Alarm Services, LLC, 2017 WL 1364978 (11th Cir. Apr. 14, 2017).  A year after the sale, the plaintiff,...

Dual Citizenship Does Not Create CAFA Jurisdiction

Two insurance class actions will remain in state court after the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Life of the South Insurance Co. v. Carzell, 2017 WL 1174083 (11th Cir. Mar. 29, 2017) (Marcus, J.). The court held that federal diversity jurisdiction does not exist under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) if all defendants and plaintiff class members are citizens of a single...

When Confirming Diversity of Citizenship, Trust—but Verify

In Purchasing Power, LLC v. Bluestem Brands, Inc., 2017 WL 1046103 (11th Cir. Mar. 20, 2017), the Eleventh Circuit reminded litigants and their counsel that it is critical to confirm the citizenship of all relevant corporate entities in determining the existence of diversity jurisdiction, but reversed the district judge’s order imposing “inherent power” sanctions on a party which had...

« Older Entries